Search for: "Welling v. Welling" Results 6221 - 6240 of 110,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Even so, the Court went on, in obiter, to declare that the well-known test in R v Ghosh [1982] EWCA Crim 2 should no longer represent the law. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:58 pm
 Since his net income from the practice may well be negative at this point given the tens of thousands of dollars in sanctions he's already amassed. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm
 As the Ninth Circuit as well as the immigration tribunals below squarely held.So Mr. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:03 am
As well as predict that the Supreme Court will soon reverse.They're right. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:01 pm
  Okay.But the Ninth Circuit says it might still violate California false advertising law to thereafter say "No Trans Fat" on the packaging -- outside the box -- when the food does indeed contain trans fat.Fair enough as well. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
To talk through the merits of Apple's lawsuit, as well as its implications for the spyware industry and cybersecurity norms more generally, Alan Rozenshtein spoke with Orin Kerr, professor of law at the UC Berkeley School of Law, and Asaf Lubin associate professor of law at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
 If you elect not to use a tape measurer, it's probably not a good idea to repeatedly call up the DMV (as well as tell the police) that you might up in there and "light up the place". [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:05 pm
 Because we may well end up giving that guy a lower sentence.None of which helps the defendant here, since he's a "career criminal" and the district court already made a substantial downward departure. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:31 am
Here's one of those rare opinions that reverses a criminal conviction -- several of them, actually -- for insufficient evidence.Judge Bea's opinion is pretty darn comprehensive, as well as persuasive. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
  My strong sense is that few of them are both aware of the error as well as able to navigate the relevant claim process. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:58 pm
  Nanny then sues Wife for defamation and other torts, Wife files but loses an anti-SLAPP motion, and Wife then appeals.All lurid stuff, with more in the actual opinion, so you can well understand why the Court of Appeal employs initials.Though it merits mention that this stuff is all over the press anyway. [read post]