Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 4:59 pm
Superior Judge John Munter emphasized in his ruling in Luquetta v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Conte v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
In Ball v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Lyle v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
In Barnes v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am
Professor Eugene Volokh and his Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic at UCLA School of Law recently filed an amicus brief on behalf of several law professors in the Lindsay Lohan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:26 am
As readers of this blog are aware, California law requires courts to reduce punitive damages awards that are disproportionate to the defendant's financial condition. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:04 am
California is here. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
For another example of the use of foreign law in an opinion joined by conservative Justices — indeed, written by Justice Scalia — see here, though there are some important distinctions between that case and this one (and, of course, the cases involving the more controversial uses of foreign law, such as Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:50 pm
A recent case in the Northern District of California, Fraley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:46 pm
The background for this dispute begins with California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
” “We are pleased that Sheriff Doyle has agreed that California law prohibits the sharing of ALPR data with entities outside of California,” said Saira Hussain, Staff Attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
" (See People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:38 pm
(People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
Section 1983”; (3) “damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act”; (4) breach of contract; and (5) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
