Search for: "Courts and Judicial System"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 26,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 4:36 pm
“Court may bless refunds for online access to judicial records; Judges express fears that government stance could lead to fees subsidizing Supreme Court curtains or ‘gold-plated toilets'”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has a report that begins, “A lawsuit accusing the federal court system of treating nearly a billion dollars in online access fees like a slush fund got a favorable reception on Monday from an appeals court,… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Finally, the United States Supreme Court ruling on the Wayfair case opened new pathways for states to legally tax remote sales. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s decisions in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Devoted to “Hard National Security Choices,” the site features top-quality writing and analysis from experts on developing stories in the national security arena, relevant legislation, and judicial opinions. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am
” The leading federal courts casebook, “Hart and Wechsler’s The Federal Courts and the Federal System,” explains that this understanding makes perfect sense of the court’s case law — across many different domains. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 10:36 am
” This case challenges the legality of user fees charged by the federal judiciary for access to records via its Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, or PACER. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 10:28 am
No system – including money bail and pretrial detention can ensure that people who are released before their trials won’t be suspected of committing another crime. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
Managed Care and Delivery Systems – States will be able to use any combination of fee-for-service and managed care delivery systems under the demonstration as long as certain guidelines are met. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 6:26 am
The suit accuses the judicial system of using the fees it charges as a kind of slush fund, spending the money to buy flat-screen televisions for jurors, to finance a study of the Mississippi court system and to send notices in bankruptcy proceedings…” [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm
The Florida Supreme Court in Joerg v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 1:30 pm
By Staff *** Updated Standards of Civility that were developed by the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) have been approved by the Judicial Departments of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, making them the official guidelines for New York lawyers. *** Read more... [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:19 am
The position involves advising and working with Bank management as well as regular interaction with attorneys from other Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:16 am
There are many backstops put in place by the judicial system to ensure that a defendant gets the most impartial jury as possible. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) jurisdiction and that failure to regulate these drugs should be subject to judicial review. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:41 pm
Ten years ago we wrote: “Just as surely as the swallows annually return to Capistrano, each winter advocates for and against Maryland’s current system of electing circuit court judges line up to do battle in Annapolis. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
This is a system designed to encourage mistakes.[12] Instead, we should demand the utmost candor in warrant applications. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:42 am
The analysis of typical, trendsetting examples of e-courts – the Civil Resolution Tribunal under Canadian Law as well as the Online Court that is currently being established in England – reveals a new model of court-connected ODR that is based on the integration of private ODR structures into the justice system. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:10 am
This is true notwithstanding that requiring the names of the parties advances the ability of the public to understand and assess the effectiveness of the court system, discourages the filing of frivolous lawsuits and unsupportable claims or assertions, and encourages truthfulness and candor by the parties. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
This panel of federal judges is known as the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and determines whether consolidation of mass tort lawsuits is appropriate and would lead to efficiency for the parties and the court system. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
This panel of federal judges is known as the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and determines whether consolidation of mass tort lawsuits is appropriate and would lead to efficiency for the parties and the court system. [read post]
