Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 1:10 am
Amidst this uncertainty the protectability of trademarks in this space was brought up in the English courts, and has since been taken on by the UK Court of Appeal.The case in question was Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd, which dealt with the company Richemont, which owns several luxury brands such as Cartier and IWC. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:25 am
Just this week, in Hall v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
UK and Australian patent attorney Daniel Rosenthal has written to tell the IPKat and Merpel all about a website for people who want to describe their jobs (mainly scientific research) using only the 1,000 most common English words. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:18 pm
I may not always agree with the result, but I can at least understand the reasoning.But in a recent ruling from Iowa Court of Appeals (Mohr v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
Mr Justice Birss has provided the answer in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat). [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
Wilkinson v London Strategic Health Authority is an interesting decision on the entitlement to copyright in training materials which has been sitting for too long in the IPKat's in-tray -- but you can read about it now thanks to Mark Anderson's to-the-point dissection of the issues on IP Draughts. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:21 am
Luckily this matter was recently brought to the Australian High Court, which ultimately decided the fate of foreign marks in Australia, and whether they can inherently distinguish the goods or services provided.The case in question was Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd, which dealt with the ever-loved subject matter of coffee. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:25 am
Just this week, in Hall v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:40 am
The most famous fictional English market trader was of course Del Boy Trotter, whom the IPKat suspects would not have been a reader of this blog, other than to see what loopholes might exist in IP law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:15 am
Try reading "have, v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:16 am
Martin v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 10:38 pm
The interviewers started with some basic questions about the recent IP Bridge v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:31 am
Papers may be submitted in English or French, and all entries should be submitted to admin@atrip.org, no later than 17 February 2020.The author of the paper should also be no older than 35 years of age as of December 31, 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
La RFD/CJWL sollicite des textes relevant des catégories suivantes : articles, études de fond, commentaires de jurisprudence, études de cas, notes de recherche, recensions de livres, et observations sur les évènements nationaux et internationaux susceptibles d’intéresser notre lectorat. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Sarang V. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 2:28 pm
On Tuesday, the child plaintiffs in J.E.F.M. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
