Search for: "Frank v. Frank"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In fact, many of the challenges and the conundrums presented by Section 404 rules were not fully appreciated until those issues surfaced again in subsequent statutes, such as the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and the JOBS Act of 2012. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act prevents any person from interfering with a whistleblower’s report, including by threatening to enforce confidentiality agreements. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Frank P. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the UK Parliament last week reminded us of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s twice-proroguing of the Canadian Parliament in the space of about a year. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
Everybody who goes public would be subject to the full panoply of regulations within 5 years or sooner if they grow fasterFor example, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act defers compliance with two Dodd-Frank Act corporate governance provisions: an advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation and the disclosure of the median compensation of all employees compared to the CEO. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CA RESIDENCY RULES & AUDIT RESIDENCY LAWS, TERMS, AND RESIDENCY CONCEPTS DEFINITION OF RESIDENT R&TC Section 17014(a) defines "resident" as: Every individual who is in this state for other than a temporary or transitory purpose; Every individual domiciled in this state who is outside the state for a temporary or transitory purpose. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Fehribach v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
’ The 2009 rule change didn’t alter the compulsory nature of the parties’ duty of full and frank disclosure: it affected who could observe a hearing, but did not extend to access to documents. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K Sanction On… [read post]
