Search for: "Little v State" Results 6241 - 6260 of 26,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 11:52 am
J. thought Danny's messages were "a little too comfortable and playful. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:21 pm
  But that's not the Ticketmaster case, in which there's little doubt that the alleged failures to disclose concerned a material condition of the contract (the relevant state law standard) and might well have led a reasonable consumer to not know what s/he was purchasing. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
If that is the case, then the Hawai'i Constitution neither permits legislation favoring entities and legislation discriminating against entities.This latter principle actually began in a piece of dictum from Santa Clara County v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:36 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of VirginiaOpinion Date: 3/13/12Cite: Western Industries-North, LLP v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:46 am by Phillips & Associates
The state legislature passed a bill on June 19, 2019 that amends the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) to address sexual harassment specifically. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
However, it is important to remember that even the State Governments have a veto over the Centre – in fact, if a little over 3/8thof the State Governments present and voting dissent, no decision can be taken by the GST Council. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:17 am by Bill Otis
I am remiss in not having posted earlier about the SCOTUS argument concerning Oklahoma's lethal injection procedures in Glossip v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If there is no money in treatment, they don’t want to spend money making new drugs with exception of those diseases granted orphan drug status by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and even in these cases, major drug makers usually have little interest. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
  Cases should not “won” or “lost” on the basis of some typo or other ministerial error.** See, e.g., Kerman Equities v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Robert Loeb
In the Guantanamo detainee case Razak Ali v. [read post]