Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 11,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 9:58 am
This Survey covers cases decided by American state and federal appellate courts from January 1 to December 31, 2013, and posted on Westlaw by midnight, December 31, 2013. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
On remand, the district court should limit the scope of the injunction to regulate conduct occurring within California. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:26 pm
So, he appealed to the California Supreme Court and this time he got support of "state legislators" and Governor "Moonbeam" and the state supreme court. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:21 am
He attended Cal Northern School of Law and passed the California Bar exam. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:50 am
[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [text, PDF] on Thursday that an immigrant in the country illegally may be admitted to the state bar. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
After years of waiting, the California Supreme Court finally made a decision that allows undocumented immigrants to be admitted to the State Bar. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:41 am
The California State Bar did an extensive investigation of his background and found that he possessed the good moral character required for admission. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
Jerry Brown, Attorney General Kamala Harris, and the State Board of Bar Examiners, pushed through legislation at the same time Garcia's case was pending in the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 11:17 am
Once the Legislature (overwhelmingly) passed a statute that expressly allows undocumented/illegal aliens to become members of the State Bar of California, there was little doubt how this case would come out. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:14 am
Dec. 23, 2013) The court found that the federal Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 preempts state consumer lawsuits alleging violations of OFPA and California’s federally approved state organic program (SOP) (codified under the California Organic Products Act of 2003, COPA). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:12 pm
Lack of General Awareness by Most Lawyers Last year, I conducted a webinar on this new LLC law (jointly sponsored by the state bar’s Partnerships and LLC Committee and the Corporations Committee), and I have spoken and will speak at county bar associations on this topic as well. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Richter, such that 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) will not bar federal habeas relief. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:51 pm
When I was asked, then, to contribute to the new New York State Bar Association publication, In the Arena: A Sports Law Handbook, I revisited the autograph issue in some more depth. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:41 pm
In one of the June decisions, the Supreme Court struck down a part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that barred federal martial benefits to same-sex couples who already had been legally married in states that allowed it. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
The former Korn/Ferry search executive was convicted for violating the CFAA and the general federal conspiracy laws in California federal court. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:57 am
The California Supreme Court has announced that it will issue an opinion -- parhaps opinions -- in the admission of Sergio Garcia, an undocumented immigrant who has passed the bar examination and moral character check, to the California State Bar.... [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:05 am
The new law in California, a state with 2.45 million undocumented immigrants, should ease community fears of reporting crime because of deportation threats. 6. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
First, the court held as a matter of law that off-label use was not “medical experimentation” under a California statute, but it was just getting warmed up. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
The state trial court found that his claims were barred by the statute of limitations, because the single publication rule meant that the period began to run upon Roberts’ first commercial use of the name. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:06 am
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has held that The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) HazCom Standard does not preempt state law, therefore allowing state lawsuits to go forward based on “failure to warn” claims.The Court dismissed the Petition filed by the American Tort Reform Association for a definitive determination concerning Federal preemption of state court based actions. [read post]
