Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Implications When the Second Circuit’s Viacom v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:20 pm
In Ardon v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court considered the latter situation in Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court considered the latter situation in Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:52 am
The split sentence option may be used in connection with a life sentence; however, there must be a period of probation attached to the suspended part of the sentence.Failure to impose a period of probation does not necessarily make the sentence illegal but simply precludes it from having the status of a split sentence under CP § 6-222. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
Given trademark law's explicit approval of concurrent uses of marks in different geographic areas or product markets, see 15 U.S.C.A. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:47 am
Reply Bradley Smith – 3 Promoted Comments This issue is exceptionally important, and one that deserves consideration given the huge changes that have occurred in mass media since George Carlin and FCC v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
Zier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
A few months ago, I wrote about the arguments being heard by the United States Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The court’s analysis begins by referring to the principles of construction set out by Lord Hodge in Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, noting that the process of construction will involve considering the words used in their “documentary, factual and commercial context. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
Its importance, and the potential for litigants to use the principle for their own ends, were considered in a judgment on the costs arising from an interim application given by Tugendhat J on 2 December 2011 (Coward v Harraden [2011] EWHC 3092 (QB)). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:12 am
Ciraolo and Florida v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm
Cir. 2003) (third-party use can establish that mark is not strong);Fleetwood Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
He succeeded in slaying the giant that even mighty CostCo had failed to successfully confront in the 2010 US Supreme Court in the 2010 CostCo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
He succeeded in slaying the giant that even mighty CostCo had failed to successfully confront in the 2010 US Supreme Court in the 2010 CostCo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:25 am
Research In Motion Limited v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
As I’ve mentioned before, 512(f) defendants will always say “I thought about fair use,” so that representation isn’t very enlightening, but the court was persuaded here. [read post]
