Search for: "V D"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 76,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
Le brevet avait pour objet une rampe pliable permettant à un passager en fauteuil roulant d'entrer dans un véhicule.La division d'opposition avait jugé que l'ancienne Opposante (qui depuis a retiré son opposition) avait vendu une telle rampe à Mme M, qui avait été entendue comme témoin.La Titulaire mettait en doute le fait que la rampe apparaissant sur la photographie de la voiture de Mme M, [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:35 am
Today's advance release employment law opinion: Nettleton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:52 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Sept. 28, 2018, FTC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
Liquides inflammables et gaz Liste de vérification de sécurit. pour les liquides inflammables. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Descargue el documento: Iván Díaz Carrasquillo v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:43 pm
In the case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
Recently, the Nebraska Supreme Court, in Gaytan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:38 am
" Dale & Selby Superette & Deli v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am
A Texas federal district court judge has decided that the Minority Business Development Agency’s (MBDA) policies that provide financial assistance to minority-owned businesses are unconstitutional.1 While the court’s decision does not apply to private businesses that may encourage supplier diversity as part of a holistic inclusion, equity and diversity (IE&D) program, companies should be aware of this development as IE&D programs evolve in the wake of the… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
The decree in EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:56 am
Today's advance release land use law opinion: 9 Pettipaug, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:25 am
LEXIS 91408 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:42 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Samuel D. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:16 am
So instead of bickering back and forth, on 7/31/12 Victoria’s Secret get the judicial system involved and filed a declaratory judgment (which asks a court to decide whether Urban Decay’s trademark/trade dress argument is legit) in Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division (please view the complaint below) Victoria’s Secret v Urban Decay Naked Makeup Trademark Complaint [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:28 am
In Asumadu v Baffoe, 2018 WL 3957696 (D. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 6:26 am
Background The insurance coverage at issue in RSUI Indemnity Company v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:27 am
Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la concurrence (Ministère public and another, interveners) (Case C-439/09); [2011] WLR (D) 359 “In the context of a selective distribution system, a contractual clause requiring sales of cosmetics and personal care products to be made in a physical space where a qualified pharmacist had to be present, resulting in a ban on the use of the internet for those sales, amounted to a… [read post]
