Search for: "W. D."
Results 6241 - 6260
of 13,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 7:39 am
(applying the “continued custody” reasoning to a guardianship); and In re Elise W. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:09 am
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) wrote a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell after the Federal Communications Commission eliminated rules that helped support the NFL's blackout policies. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
Healthcare, Inc., 475 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 207), held that “‘[w]ithout a clearly contrary opinion of the Supreme Court or of this court sitting en banc, we cannot overrule a decision of a prior panel of this court. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
I must confess that I don’t fully understand Peter Margulies’ response to my post from earlier today. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
The role of this Court is to apply the statute as it is written – even if we think some other approach might ‘accor[d] with good policy. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:49 pm
— Kevin O'Keefe (@kevinokeefe) September 25, 2014 @hsiaoleim @tim_baran Meet people & grow word of mouth in strategic fashion; people see you engaging with the influencers and who's who — Kevin O'Keefe (@kevinokeefe) September 25, 2014 @hsiaoleim @tim_baran blogging is not content per se, any more than we'd classify networking face to face as "words marketing. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
” Id. at comment d, the Restatement gives several examples of joint torts that can be apportioned by cause. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:05 pm
” Rule 1(d). [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
They'd have to be tappable, too. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 8:23 am
By Georgia D. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
[W]hat the claim adds to the prior art is the use of rules, rather than artists, to set the morph weights and transitions between phonemes [the smallest unit of speech, corresponding to a single sound]. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
They'd have to be tappable, too. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(w) Payments received as compensation for the loss of future earnings of the judgment debtor or of a person upon whom the judgment debtor is dependent at the time the payment is received, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the judgment debtor and any dependent of the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(w) Payments received as compensation for the loss of future earnings of the judgment debtor or of a person upon whom the judgment debtor is dependent at the time the payment is received, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the judgment debtor and any dependent of the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:08 pm
As a result, the OIG writes, “[w]hile copayment coupons provide an immediate financial benefit to beneficiaries, they ultimately can harm both Federal health care programs and their beneficiaries. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:37 am
Bakke, John O'Loughlin, Gerard Toal & Michael D. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:30 am
Her hostile work environment claim failed, however (Miljkovic v University Anesthesiologists, SC, September 18, 2014, Hart, W). [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:17 pm
I’ll go first to get you started: I pretty much have my dream job but I’d love to write for The Daily Show. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:47 am
It goes on the same line as income you report with a federal W-2. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
See 1 D. [read post]
