Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 2:29 pm
When it is posted, the opinion will be available at this link: Miller v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Here are the final four briefs in Comm'n on Ethics of the State of Nevada v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:21 am
Among other ways to streamline the process, Act 2 bars the employer from filing a counterclaim against the employee.1 In Bacardí Corporation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
MOLNAR v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:01 pm
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's dismissal.More detail of ExcelStor Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:55 am
More detail of Acumed LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The dismissal of a probationary employee will not survive judicial review if the court finds that it was made in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of the lawRieser v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2015 NY Slip Op 08119, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMichael Rieser, a probationary teacher employed by the New York City Department of Education [DOE], received an unsatisfactory performance rating and ultimately DOE terminated him… [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
In Center for Inquiry, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Adding parties to the litigation pursuant to the “relation-back" doctrineCrawford v City of New York, 2015 NY Slip Op 05267, Appellate Division, First DepartmentBarry E. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
HSS Enters. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:00 am
The post Case Review – Built By Engineers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
Hale v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
State and its companion cases, the Indiana Supreme Court disposed of several cases that all asked the same question: does the United States Supreme Court's 2004 holding in Blakely v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:20 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:00 pm
The Supreme Court has denied a petition for review in Harper v. 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 5:20 pm
Another intellectual-property dispute between two makers of iPhone flatulence-simulation apps does not seem at all unlikely (as of last year, there were maybe 75 such apps), and if one does, this will provide somebody with a template.Link: Infomedia, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 9:54 am
For example, in Weinberger v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 11:23 am
The GFE does not apply in Pennsylvania. [read post]
