Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
You’re in federal court, and on to discovery. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:08 pm
In a 2006 decision called In re Napier, Judge Waites reasoned that in using the word “dependent” throughout section 707(b), Congress intended that concept should guide the determination of household members. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
In In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:16 pm
The oil and gas industries have benefited from decades of tax relief designed to stimulate exploration. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:01 pm
On Wednesday, a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by Belmont Abbey College (the first of the two dozen challenges to the birth control rule). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
It instead says that even if you're still in prison, and even if giving you future good conduct credits for time you spend in prison in the future would encourage you to be good, we're not going to give them to you if you committed your crime prior to October 1, 2011. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Motion to Compel re: Interrogatory The second motion to compel sought to compel a different defendant, ICE & OVS to supplement a response to an interrogatory seeking sales information. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:10 am
He does his judging adamantly and reasonably. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
The judge found no infringement, but certified the question regarding copyrightability to the ECJ. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
” You will not find that language anywhere, because the Rules were designed in part to prevent judges like Scalia from using their subjective feelings to dismiss cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:02 am
The bottom line is: because the courts’ usage of tablets is so common, if you’re not filing iPad-focused hyperlinked briefs, you’re leaving a persuasive tool in the shed. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
Is that right, he asked the judge. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Judge Birss didn’t grant Samsung’s bid for an injunction blocking Apple from making public statements that the Galaxy infringed its design rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/NHdtDb (Greg Jacobs) Privacy and Security Surrounding The Cloud - Article 29 Working Paper Guidance - http://bit.ly/M3L5MS (Kate Gorey) Race to the HighCourt: Hoosier Racing Seeks High Court Review of Third Circuit’s Slashing of eDiscovery Cost Award – http://bit.ly/OAsPKX (Mark Sidoti) Recruiter Misuse of Social Media Can Increase Risk of Liability - http://bit.ly/LVVfPE (Alexander Nemiroff) Re-Thinking and Rejecting… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:16 am
[Refusal of MADETOORDER for "“on-line design services for others in the field of personalized and custom design transfers, namely, text, pictures and graphics for imprinting on apparel"].In re HEB Grocery Company, LP, Serial No. 85027087 (June 29, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:41 pm
It's time for Americans to have their day in court and for a judge to rule on the legality of this massive surveillance. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:31 pm
So far it has the makings of a AAA title judging from the names associated with the project. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
We’re only after generic identification, Kammen argues. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:03 am
James: Usage Limits and Judicial Reluctance Non-reliance clauses arouse a lot of controversy, and not all judges are eager to enforce them. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:18 am
The case is In re: Dang Case No. 3:11-2970 [read post]
