Search for: "One (1) Machine" Results 6261 - 6280 of 8,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 7:43 am by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
The bill of information alleges that Hendricks knowingly and willfully made three material false statements during the interview: 1) Hendricks denied transferring a fully automatic machine gun owned by the Vidalia Police Department to the custody of an individual or individuals at the Rifle Point Hunting Club, when in truth and in fact he had done so for use by members and guests of the club; 2) Hendricks falsely claimed that one of the individuals to whom custody of the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:43 am by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
The bill of information alleges that Hendricks knowingly and willfully made three material false statements during the interview: 1) Hendricks denied transferring a fully automatic machine gun owned by the Vidalia Police Department to the custody of an individual or individuals at the Rifle Point Hunting Club, when in truth and in fact he had done so for use by members and guests of the club; 2) Hendricks falsely claimed that one of the individuals to whom custody of the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:24 am by Mala Mason
The rule went into effect on January 19, 2010, with a mandatory compliance date of July 1, 2010. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am by Falk Metzler
An essentially parallel device claim 22 was directed to device for determining the genotype at a locus within genetic material obtained from a subject executing the method according to claim 1. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:21 pm by David Kravets
What’s more, the group claims the machines, among other things, violate the federal Video Voyeurism Prevent Act, which protects against capturing improper images that violate one’s privacy. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:44 am by Adam Thierer
” (p. 306) There’s a lot to unpack here including Wu’s stunning claim that his Separations Principle doesn’t represent a regulatory regime, as well as his rather incredible belief that government meddling and machinations could be kept in check under this regime. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:25 am by Elisabetta Fersini
Enabling the end user to consult transcriptions by considering the associated semantics as well, represents an important achievement, one that allows the end user to retrieve an enriched written sentence instead of a “flat” one. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
With the Supreme Court's decision in Chun that the machine is scientifically reliable, one of the better ways to challenge the machine now is how it has operated over a period of time. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm by admin
  An average new home sits on a quarter of an acre of land in the West but almost a full acre here, where the minimum lot size in Greater Boston is generally 1 acre or more. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:16 am
In Part 1, we posited several data points, and began our interview with "Dr Bill. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 10:03 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Related post: Patent Fundamentals (Part 1) [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:02 pm by Schachtman
  The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law,” 72 Law & Contemporary Problems 1 (2009). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 2:23 pm
However, when she later awoke it was 1 AM and her Halloween fun had sadly vanquished - a lesson that there is no such thing as a Kat nap. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:33 pm by Adam Thierer
I spent time developing these points in detail in this two-part debate [1, 2] with Lawrence Lessig, which I hope Prof. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:47 am by admin
Managing to avoid use of the rather unedifying and ubiquitous catchphrase employed by the Specsavers' advertising machine, the Which? [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:26 pm by Vincent LoTempio
The most common misconception concerning patents is that a patent gives one a right to practice his/her invention. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
If you’re fairly quick on the old computing machine, it may take you as little as 20 minutes to put one together. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Issue preclusion operates when (1) the issue at stake is identical to the one involved in the prior litigation; (2) the issue was actually litigated in the prior suit; (3) the determination of the issue in the prior litigation was a critical and necessary part of the judgment in that action; and (4) the party against whom the earlier decision is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier proceeding. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:55 am by Regan Zambri & Long
" The report, titled "The Chamber Litigation Machine: How the Chamber Uses Lawsuits to Keep Americans out of Court," can be found by clicking here. [read post]