Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 6261 - 6280 of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 8:42 pm by Michael O'Hear
 To be sure, there are studies that suggest that fear of legal sanctions is not the only, or even the most important, reason that people obey the law. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:37 pm by Rhoda Feng
United States to the American people through a massive and sustained education campaign. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:10 pm
More people need than produce, so the people expand the power of those that give them what the producers make. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Adam Thierer
You are asking us to create…  a whole new prohibition which the American people never — never ratified when they ratified the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
By applying demonstrably erroneous precedent instead of the relevant law's text—as the Court is particularly prone to do when expanding federal power or crafting new individual rights—the Court exercises "force" and "will," two attributes the People did not give it. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A: Wouldn’t be mandatory, but there are situations where people didn’t think of it in advance—Aalmuhammed v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:51 am by Susan Brenner
I’ve always found it amazing that many U.S. state constitutions have similar provisions, and that a few people have been prosecuted for state treason. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am by David Hart QC
Biowatch Trust v Registrar Genetic Resources and Others (CCT 80/08) [2009] ZACC 14 – read judgment Costs again, I am afraid, and how to make sure that ordinary people can litigate important cases without being stifled by a huge costs bill if they lose. [read post]