Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 6261 - 6280 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
Peter street to Preservation Hall. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
Peter street to Preservation Hall. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
  As they are published, all of these pieces will be available on the homepage, as well as in our archives by navigating to “Special Features” and clicking on “Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
ACSblog has two posts on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
With specialist chapters written by leading academic and practising lawyers, including Peter Oliver himself, this edition has been extensively rewritten to take into account recent judgments from the ECJ, including important cases such as C-110/05 Commission v Italy ("trailers") and C- 142/05 Mickelsson ("jet skis") [oh dear, the Kat didn't spot this one when it was decided, but it does mention the free movement of goods ... just], both of which relate to… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
Via the cheerfully enthusiastic Open Rights Group campaigner Peter Bradwell comes news that ORGZine has commenced a series of short, punchy pieces on what the UK Government should do with Digital Opportunity, the recent report of the Hargreaves Review. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by Anita Davies
The Chairman of the Council, Peter Lodder QC said that the “A cut-price, DIY justice system, which will actually end up costing more money, rather than saving it, is in no one’s interests. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:57 am by Perry Herzfeld
John Fogarty, ‘Peter Edward Nygh AM: His Work and Times’ (2010) 1 Family Law Review 4: In this article the author outlines and honours the work and life of Peter Edward Nygh AM. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:16 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Inside Google+ — How the Search Giant Plans to Go Social" http://j.mp/l6VBe7 The Peter Black Daily is out! [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Richard Zorza
Thank you to all who posted for a spectacularly worthwhile and open conversation about Turner v. [read post]