Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 27,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
Code. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:48 pm
See Krumpelbeck v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:39 pm
Code, § 515, subd. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm
Contreras v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 11:32 am
That case, Ayala v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am
I guess the Oracle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oklahoma, Michigan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
’ United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The case, In re Monarch Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 9:50 am
As much as I’m for more legislation and discussion over cybersecurity issues, especially for Criminal Code warrants, production and preservation orders, there is some room for privacy concerns here as well. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:40 am
Compensation paid to a member of public retirement system by a private entity not credited in determining the member's Final Average SalaryMatter of Andrews v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2011 NY Slip Op 00132, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentDonald Andrews joined the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System [NYSTRS] in 1967. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 12:32 pm
Rather, it is simply a procedural statute allowing an aggrieved employee to recover civil penalties for Labor Code violations that otherwise would be sought by state labor law enforcement agencies. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Code § 2116; see also Villari v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
" State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
Code § 1983 for violating the 1st Amendmentand/or 4th Amendment. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am
She noted that this is a “common fact pattern” and is consistent with the facts underlying the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
Rutherford v. [read post]
