Search for: "State v. Self" Results 6261 - 6280 of 15,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2017, 5:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York City Human Rights law is a self-contained statute that provides employees greater protections that its state and federal counterparts. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm by kerry.sheehan
The most thoroughly developed of these proposes a legislative restructuring of copyright exhaustion in a flexible, multi-factor format, in part modeled on the United States’ fair use doctrine. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm by Larry
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
For Reinert, the Court’s relative assertiveness in habeas can be explained as an instance of judicial self-defense against concerted attacks by the political branches (culminating in Boumediene) whereas its lassitude in Bivens litigation represents a kind of judicial self-abnegation with the Co [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This shift is largely the result of two Delaware court decisions, the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself: “If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:17 pm by Amy Howe
The gun rights case, Peruta v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm by Lawfare Editors
  There is a world of difference between formulating thought-provoking theses on ethical theory relevant to IHRL, and thereby advancing the dialogue between philosophers and international lawyers (the book’s stated goal), and explaining how ethical theory can justify the entire, diverse and sometimes self-contradictory corpus of international human rights law (the goal he ascribes to the book). [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The order grants partial injunctive relief in Waymo's favor, but does not halt Uber's self-driving car operation. [read post]