Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6261 - 6280 of 14,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States:  Is throwing a fish overboard a violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was supposed to be about reforming financial institutions? [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm by Jon Sands
  The government will have another opportunity to prove the amount of loss.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/08/07/14-30034.pdf United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has refused to review an appeal of a California State Court decision, Bailey v National City, Calif., 277 Cal Rptr 427, which had sustained the termination of a police officer who was found to have violated department rules concerning outside work, used his position as a police officer for personal gain and refused to discontinue a personal association with a known felon.* See United States v ILA Local 1588, 2003 WL 221851, 2003 US Dist… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
In the announcement, CalPERS states it has sent proxy access shareholder proposals to 33 energy companies as a way to push this climate change agenda. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am by Steve Vladeck
Nashiri has raised distinct challenges to the commission's authority over both of these episodes, arguing that the Cole bombing took place at a time when there was no armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda, and that the attack on the M/V Limburg--a French-flag ship in the Gulf of Aden--cannot reasonably be connected to the (by then clearly established) non-international armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm by Tobias Thienel
In a separate set of proceedings instituted by Yugoslavia against all the member States of NATO relating to the Kosovo air campaign, the Court firmly stated in December 2004 that Yugoslavia had not been a member of the United Nations, that it had therefore not enjoyed a right of access to the Court, and that the Court was therefore not competent to deal with the case (Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
  The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:13 am
United States, 458 F.3d 1345, 1352 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
’…An individual is held ‘in custody’ by the United States when the United States official charged with his detention has ”the power to produce’ him,” citing an 1855 decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]