Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 7,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
Plaintiff alleges that, despite emerging evidence, selenium does not in fact prevent or reduce the risk of prostate cancer. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
Co. v Russell, 50 AD3d 1611 (4th Dept. 2008). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:34 am
Dre would relinquish his 50% ownership interest in Death Row and assign all copyrights in his recordings. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Then, Levine contacted the rest of the plaintiff’s attorneys and the defendant’s attorney. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 7:48 pm
Seems I am not the only one who thinks so as the Wall Street Journal just ran an by Jones Day attorney Benjamin Bai, entitled, "Yes, China Does Protect Intellectual Property: Multinational companies just need to take better advantage of opportunities to defend their patents. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
In paragraphs 15, 49, 50 and 52, The North Face alleges that it has trade dress rights in the Denali jacket and that Defendants are trading on its trademarks and trade dress. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
for $410 (the maximum), $300, $200, $100, $50 or whatever you can afford today. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
February 11, 2010Dear Colleagues: To prepare for a television show with Erin Arvedlund on the SEC Inspector General’s 457 page Report on the SEC’s malfeasance in the Madoff matter, I have identified what I think the most important excerpts from the Report. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Costello v Kiaer, 278 AD2d 50; Hawkins v Lenox Hill Hosp., 138 AD2d 572). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
Cir. 2003), the court explained that “mere submission of an IDS to the USPTO does not constitute the patent applicant’s admission that any reference in the IDS is material prior art. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:46 am
That might have led to a special order for costs, e.g. that the claimant should only get 50% of his costs. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:17 am
So now we have a dead 30-year-old and a 24-year-old whose three-year prison sentence will forever alter his life, if not ruin it, and all to prove that alcohol doesn’t mix any better with testosterone than it does with gasoline. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
Cir. 357, 359-362 (Richmond Apr. 9, 1991)(location of tort plus witnesses 50 miles away). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:53 am
Given these concerns, it will be very interesting to see what Judge Rakoff does with the renewed settlement. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
But Pentalpha does not argue that it relied on the lack of a mark to come to a belief that the deep fryer was not patented. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
If the defendant fails to do so, the Pollution Control Board must find that the defendant committed the violations alleged and impose the corresponding civil penalty. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
If the defendant fails to do so, the Pollution Control Board must find that the defendant committed the violations alleged and impose the corresponding civil penalty. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
NO SUPER-MAJORITY FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS QUESTION: If our CC&Rs from 1963 say a 2/3 vote is needed for a special assessment, does the HOA follow the CC&Rs or can they go by the current law which requires a quorum of more than 50%? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:50 pm
February 5, 2010 - A summary review of Aviation and Airport Development related news and information that was made public during the past ten days. [read post]
