Search for: "ADAMS v. ADAMS" Results 6281 - 6300 of 8,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
New York: North Point Press, 2014.Fiordalis, David V., ed. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 For obvious reasons, I'm not competent to assess the validity of the complaints other than to say that the Times article certainly provides grounds for doubt and curiosity about why the Institution is so adamant, given that the Cooper Hewitt Board is happy with the now ex-director's leadership. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin posted the court documents from the consolidated cases under Dalmazzi v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Adam Segal discussed a new report on U.S. cyber policy from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and compared it to a report on the same topic nine years ago from CFR, both of which he was the project director for. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm
To give just one example, he has heard several different versions of what US software patenting is all about in the wake of Alice v CLS Bank [noted on this blog by Darren here], but what is the reality on the ground so far as patents examined and granted before and after Alice are concerned, and for examiners, businesses and investors? [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm by Lisa Ouellette
When the Supreme Court changed the standard for assessing obviousness in 2007 with KSR v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Nick also analyzed how the iPhone’s TouchID feature intersects with the concept of a warrantless search as was determined in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
In his Sidebar column for the New York Times, Adam Liptak describes the cert. petition of death-row inmate Cory R. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This evidence is sufficient for a fact-finder to determine that defendant breached its duty of loyalty to plaintiff, a former client (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 456 [1st Dept 1987] [ethical standards applying to the practice of law impose a continuing obligation upon lawyers to refuse employment in matters adversely affecting a client’s interests, even if the client is a former client]). [read post]