Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 6281 - 6300 of 12,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although I agree with him that Justice Kennedy does not adequately engage, but rather hollows out, Seattle, the writing that Justice Kennedy’s opinion reminds me of most is Justice Scalia’s own opinion in Employment Division of Oregon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
However, having initially “kept its powder dry” at the first hearing, Google then made a “root and branch attack” [15] on the order of Mr Justice Stephens by way of appeal before Mr Justice Horner. [read post]
Justice O'Neill notes her dissent to granting the motion for rehearing [without separate opinion] (link to original superseded opinion)MORE LOOSE GRAVEL IMMUNITY: THE COMPANION CASETxDoT v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
As echoed across the ideological spectrum, Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion shed all pretense of maintaining the legal Right’s long professed “originalist” fidelity to text and the framers’ design. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:39 am by SHG
Thoughtless or baseless “opinion” isn’t opinion at all. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:48 pm
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote in 2007, summing up his approach in one of the most memorable lines of his opinions. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
His Lawrence opinion went out of its way to distinguish marriage, as Dean notes. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
    The Supreme Court has sometimes indicated, in later opinions, that the exception to jurisdiction goes beyond divorce, alimony, and child support, but the Justices have never ruled expressly on whether questions relating to marriage are also excluded from federal courts’ jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm by Roger Alford
Hays: Actually, Your Honor, the United States and Canada do, and the analysis- Justice Scalia: Well, wait … You're writing our opinion for us, are you? [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented from the court’s decision not to intervene, in a brief opinion that was joined by Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 10:19 am
This likely changed the nature of the sanctions from civil penalties to a retroactive increase in criminal penalties, which could run afoul of constitutional protections, the justices wrote.- Thus violating the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution.The most stinging rebuke came from Justices Donald Alexander and Warren Silver, who wrote a concurring opinion in stronger language. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:43 pm by admin
Those invested in the trial or simply the opinionated among us on the fringes, have allowed these decisions to become divisive, fracturing our faith in the criminal justice system itself. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:01 am
Remember that we tend to stumble and fail when we're Hungry, Angry, Lonely (marginalized) or Tired (HALT) and so do our clients. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
Finally, Vice-Chancellor Strine offers a provocative footnote, re-interpreting a couple of famous Delaware Supreme Court opinions, Quickturn and Omnicare. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
This error in the Respondent’s brief about differential diagnosis unfortunately finds its way into Justice Sotomayor’s opinion. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Harry Cole
 Younger readers will be forgiven if they’re not familiar with that quaintly archaic phrase. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  That is, in theory we’re looking for symbols that perform a source-identifying function. [read post]