Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 6:00 am
Seuss Enterprises v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:02 am
Pirani v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:57 pm
For antitrust attorneys, this is particularly interesting because in most cases in which a plaintiff includes both federal and state antitrust claims, they rise and fall together. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:38 am
Sexual harassment that involves a physical component is even more serious since it rises to the level of sexual assault. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:34 am
In that case, Pernix Serka Joint Venture v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:13 am
The case is Friends of Danny DeVito et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:01 am
United States Department of Commerce and Litgo N.J., Inc. v. [read post]
German Federal Agencies Publish Privacy and IT Security Requirements for Digital Health Applications
7 May 2020, 12:04 am
Scope of application The DiGAV applies when the provider of a digital health application seeks reimbursement from German state health schemes. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:11 pm
On Monday, May 4, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:02 am
From Duggar v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm
However, in two 2019 rulings – the Marchand v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 1:10 pm
The Supreme Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm
This week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Having discussed the origin and scope of official minority categories at the federal and state level, this Article next turns to a second issue–what evidence individuals must provide to demonstrate membership in these categories. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
Such a gloss would be inconsistent with the requirement of a high level of predictability in recital 15. [read post]
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
While I focus Pelham matters here, the decision shows unity with the CJEU’s harmonisation of EU law, including towards a high level of copyright protection. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
What the GC et al decision does do is suggest an immediate and positive way forward for substantive data protection at a policy and not just judicial level. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]