Search for: "Robert v. State"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 19,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
In particular, NAGR and Bevis point to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am
Circuit’s reasoning in Price v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:58 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
§282 which states: A patent shall be presumed valid…. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
If the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on integrated schools and ignored Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:26 am
” Pitman, clearly, would not be making any rulings in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
See Knick v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
" Like with the UK, the general rule is that the rights in an invention belong to the inventor (Gayler v Wilder (1851));Solomons v US (1890)). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:33 pm
In nearly identical documents, the Justice Department lawyers contended that the Circuit Court’s February ruling in Kiyemba v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:27 pm
There are significant additions to the Senate bill that are not presently contained in the House bill, including a whistleblower immunity provision, a shorter statute of limitation (3 years v. 5 years), lower exemplary damages (2 times v. 3 times actual damages), as well as increased criminal penalties for a violation of the Economic Espionage Act and it also includes portions of the DTSA as predicate offenses for the RICO Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 pm
And you can access at this link the transcript of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
