Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6281 - 6300 of 10,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2013, 11:59 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Clapper, the government acknowledged (in a footnote) that the law "confers authority for collecting the contents of wire communications to or from a person in the United States." [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee’s disability bias claim alleging that her employer discriminated against her based on her short stature survived her employer’s motion to dismiss, a federal district court in Arizona ruled (McElmurry v Arizona Department of Agriculture, June 11, 2013, Snow, G). [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Gene Quinn
Over the past several days, the United States Supreme Court has issued several important decisions that will impact the patent system. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm by James Ridgway
  That may sound unworkable, but that is the position taken by the veteran in a case called Tyrues v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Filed: December 10, 1999. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
It asserts state tort claims against all the individual defendants, rather than against the United States, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am by Glenn
Tech business news these days is dominated by headlines about the trial of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:22 am by David Oscar Markus
Here, Defendant asserts that, under Brady v. [read post]