Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 6281 - 6300
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
Specialty Healthcare framework consistent with NLRA, but regional director did not properly apply it
23 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
(Section 9(c) of the NLRA explicitly states that “in determining whether a unit is appropriate . . . the extent to which the employees have organized shall not be controlling. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
For most of you, that means some combination of: (a) raising salaries; (b) converting salaried employees to hourly; (c) limiting overtime opportunities; and (d) layoffs. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:29 pm
Trades Council v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm
Carias v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:19 am
Weber – Bankruptcy: Business Nicole S. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
[B]ut it's really not a game . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
The Tribunal also employed the Court’s decision in Snell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:47 am
Jaszi in 1981 followed Kaplan but suggested that the Romantic fever had broken b/c imitation was widespread in serious literature. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:05 am
., LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:53 am
On Tuesday, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
It was therefore said to lack utility under section 18(1)(c) of the Patents Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
(c) After the vote is stated [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 6:57 am
If Gang Member A tells Gang Member B falsely that Gang Member C had a change of heart and is refusing to participate in an upcoming robbery, this may lower Gang Member C in the eyes of Gang Member B, but the law doesn’t care because a criminal enterprise is not a substantial nor a respectable segment of society. [read post]
