Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 36,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 12:35 pm
In South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 1:38 pm
Walden v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
With the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:05 am
The Texas legislature has responded to the Texas Supreme Court’s recent and controversial opinion in Tedder v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
It calls for difficult political balances and bargaining with foreign powers beyond SCOTUS's reach. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
The whole point of the Fourteenth Amendment was to rein in State power and to impose some uniform national rules. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
The Remedy Following a Batson Violation The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
The Remedy Following a Batson Violation The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court granted cert today in Carcieri v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
Power Co., 406 F. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:56 am
‘Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am
” Oka v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:12 am
It's unusual to see state governments taking the side of property owners in takings cases, as that limits the states' own powers. [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 8:55 am
” Although valuable, “it will not remake the administrative state or solve the post-New Deal power imbalance in the federal government. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 3:30 am
Last term, in Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 6:44 am
[1] United States v. [read post]
