Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 6281 - 6300 of 11,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 5:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
Eight-seven minutes into the call, Spaw used the recording device provided by the IT department to record the final four minutes of the Huffs' conversation. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:22 pm by Susanne Klaric
  The SEC’s stated intent also conflicts with the views of at least one other federal agency. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court has already struck down RFRA as it applied to actions by state governments. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:15 am by Jon Hyman
Because Summers alleges a severe injury that prevented him from walking for at least seven months, he has stated a claim that this impairment “substantially limited” his ability to walk. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Wallman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
In contrast, the State urges use of less stringency, relying on State of New York v Pedraza wherein in the context of a Mental Hygiene Law article 10 probable cause proceeding, the court adopted the standard applicable at a preliminary hearing, namely, whether there exists reasonable cause to believe explaining that all the court is inquiring into at this early stage is whether there exists sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada released a decision this week in Hryniak v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY – VANDALISM – INTENT & STATE OF MIND OF THE VANDAL – MALICEGeorgitsi Realty, LLC v Penn-Star Ins. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:29 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On 14 January, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Jones v. [read post]