Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 10,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 6:49 am
As new symptoms arise, the fable taught that lawmakers (or regulators) are justified in revisiting the diagnosis, unfettered by judicial interference or constitutional constraint.In the Supreme Court's 1957 majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
United States Olympic Committee (1987), the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
United States (thermal imaging of a home to detect heat consistent with marijuana grow operation was a search for Fourth Amendment purposes). [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 8:10 pm
Most surveys of these three sentencing eras have focused on the changing power of the judge: from unfettered discretion before the Sentencing Guidelines, to severely restricted discretion under the mandatory guidelines, to our current system of guided discretion under United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:05 am
Integra and Burnham sued Merck, Cheresh, and Scripps for patent infringement.307 Writing for a unanimous Court in Merck KGaA v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
Here is the abstract:Thanks to Richard Posner's classic 1972 article, A Theory of Negligence Law, the "Hand formula" of United States. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Here is the abstract: Thanks to Richard Posner's classic 1972 article, A Theory of Negligence Law, the "Hand formula" of United States. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:16 pm
More speculatively, another very recent decision, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Open in 2005 and The United States Tennis Association contracted with Restaurant Associates to provide catering services. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:31 am
A little nudge goes a long way in increasing organ donor registrationsNicole Robitaille Canadians support organ donation but less than a quarter have made plans to donate. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:49 am
Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
Beyond that, we have what I described elsewhere as an ‘epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the land,’ a phrase that has brought much controversy but brought about little change in the way prosecutors operate in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
The United States Supreme Court has unequivocally established that in civil commitment hearings, the standard of proof can be no lower than “clear and convincing evidence” to satisfy procedural due process under the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:45 pm
Response of the United States to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress, U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
Yet there is little reason for states to innovate, given the current legislative incentives. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But not the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The answer is a little of both. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
