Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 32,313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 11:26 am
Within 3 years of certification, the state would certify whether or not they either: 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
It should also be informed by the rights enshrined in s. 8 of the Charter, which in turn must remain aligned with technological developments. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
I, Sec. 8, Cl. 8 (1789). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
[12] IRC § 61[13] “Gross income defined” which contains the general definition of “gross income” was amended by striking paragraph (a) (8) titled “Alimony and separate maintenance payments” and by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (15) as paragraphs (8) through (14), respectively. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
[12] IRC § 61[13] “Gross income defined” which contains the general definition of “gross income” was amended by striking paragraph (a) (8) titled “Alimony and separate maintenance payments” and by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (15) as paragraphs (8) through (14), respectively. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
It's the 8 or 10 bits, read together, that actually give the position. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
§ 121.406(b)(1)(i). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
[1] Mother's Day. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
Pursuant to this provision, an interference with rights enshrined in article 8 paragraph 1 is justified if it is in accordance with the law, serves a legitimate aim and is necessary in a democratic society. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
We also find that the impact of enhanced 8-K disclosures does not vary with the extent of financial constraints before the regulatory change. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
It seems to have aimed for a middle-ground solution whereby Proposition 8 is declared unconstitutional in California, but the decision does not have broad implications for other States. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
It seems to have aimed for a middle-ground solution whereby Proposition 8 is declared unconstitutional in California, but the decision does not have broad implications for other States. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
A domestic issuer exemption was adopted by the Kansas Office of the Securities Commissioner, effective August 12, 2011, along with updates to federal securities statutory and rule references.An issuer’s offer or sale of a security is exempt from registration, advertising filing and issuer-agent licensing, provided:(1) the issuer is a Kansas-organized business;(2) the transaction complies with the federal intrastate offering exemption at Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:05 pm
The district court then reached the ultimate conclusion that the ’940 patent does not enable claims 1-5 of the ’814 patent and thus, it is not anticipatory. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:56 am
Ontiberos filed a cross-PR on March 8, 2011.]Here is coverage on What the Judge Ate for Breakfast. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
It also means 25% (1 in 4) still had no contract in four years. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
The language in the CARES Act does not require the landlord to provide an opportunity to cure. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:49 am
It beat out North Carolina, who does not appear on the list despite having almost 1 million more people. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:26 pm
Pennsylvania 8. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:01 pm
Rul. 2012-4 are specifically limited to rollovers made on or after Jan. 1, 2013 pursuant to Code section 7805(b)(8) but the IRS states it will permit plan sponsors to rely on the holdings of this ruling with respect to rollovers made prior to Jan. 1, 2013. [read post]
