Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL" Results 6301 - 6320 of 8,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
DeJoy ARGUED: 4/18/2023 In this case, the Court will decide what is an “undue hardship” for an employer under the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s Title VII, after a postal worker declined to work on Sundays delivering Amazon packages due to his religious beliefs.Jack Daniel's Properties v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
Wolfish (1979), which focuses on whether a “condition of confinement” constitutes punishment, can be reconciled with Daniels v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Danielle Romero-Apsilos, a Citigroup spokeswoman, declined to comment further. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
While the only obvious blockbuster of this term was already argued in Citizens United, some cases prove monumental only in retrospect, argues Daniel Fisher in Forbes' business section. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am by Dominic Adair
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
Our proposal codifies the approach the Ninth Circuit took in CFTC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am by jonathanturley
That included the case of Daniel Goodwyn, who pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor count of entering and remaining in a restricted building. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
  France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46)   Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:30 am by Dennis Crouch
One of Holte’s first substantive patent decisions comes in Wanker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Opinion below (1st Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1403 Title: Daniels v. [read post]