Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 88,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Suk argues that this legal choice – a legal misogyny – exacts distinctive costs from women and confers excessive entitlements on men. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
Schindler v Isller & Schrage, P.C., 262 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1999], lv dismissed 94 NY2d 791 [1999] [plaintiff granted judgment on Judiciary Law § 487 claim as defendant law firm knowingly withheld crucial information from court in underlying action]; cf Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696 [2d Dept 2018] [defendant attorney was properly denied summary dismissal of Judiciary Law § 487 claim based on allegations that he filed blatantly deficient accounting with court, which… [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:41 am
A long legal battle over the status of “the greatest of all cheeses,” comes to an apparent end. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
Although still significantly far from being head-on competitors to Thomson Reuters or LexisNexis (RELX), it is asserted, with bravado, by v-Lex Group’s chief strategy officer, to be “the beginning of the end of the duopoly in legal research”. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Kelo was an important decision that drew a massive political backlash (over 80% of the public opposed the ruling, and 45 states enacted eminent domain reform laws in reaction to it) and remains contentious to this day. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Investing to advance a societal goal constitutes a mixed motive, a fiduciary violation.[2] The attorneys general of a number of states have drafted legal opinions prohibiting their public entities from ESG investing on this basis.[3] These opinions rely on an assumption that ESG investing is non-pecuniary and therefore entails a mixed motive. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:12 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:10 pm
In Andersen v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Mondelez International v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 12:24 pm
Eric Solotoff is the editor of the New Jersey Family Legal Blog and the Co-Chair of the Family Law Department of Fox Rothschild LLP. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am
(This article does not address the other antitrust and state law claims also at issue in the 91-page opinion.)The legal battle involved “a multi-trillion dollar technology company” (Apple) versus “a multi-billion dollar video game company” (Epic). [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:38 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am
After all, didn’t Epic Games v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:01 am
Stories on the 2021 State v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
