Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 6301 - 6320
of 13,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part II surveys the provisions of the draft AUMF that have generated the most controversy and debate, including: (a) its lack of a stated purpose; (b) the prohibition on “enduring offensive ground combat operations”; (c) its definition of “associated forces”; (d) its transparency and oversight provision; (e) its relationship to the Law of Armed Conflict; (f) its sunset clause; and (g) one final matter that has flown under the radar up to this point insofar as ISIL is… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:48 am
Por otro lado, la sección 1(e) (3) (B) excluye la compensación de los siguientes daños: pérdida de ganancias y oportunidades, daños por angustias y sufrimientos, y daños punitivos. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:08 pm
Employers who do not want to issue new Wage Theft Prevention Notices to all current employees may instead inform those employees of the change to paid sick leave by using an alternative method authorized by Labor Code section 2810.5(b)(1) or (b)(2) (e.g., giving notice of change in a pay stub or itemized wage statement). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:01 am
G.S. 15A-401(b)(1),(b)(2)(f.). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
It would yield bad both results on both sides, allowing statements to be admitted when they shouldn’t be and excluding them when they should be admitted.1. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
But I’m making an exception for this one, because I think it is timely. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:48 am
M. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
So overall I’m disappointed with the way matters have developed since Crawford. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 8:43 am
I’m sure more information would be necessary, along with the usual financial statement, and certainly the affidavits would conclude with an unscripted portion allowing the litigant to set out the necessary facts to address less common issues such as the imputation of income, undue hardship claims and stepparent relationships. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:06 am
La misma se llevará a cabo el sábado, 28 de febrero de 2015 de 9:00AM a 12:45PM en el Aula Magna de la Escuela (salón L-1). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
Opinion by The Honorable David M. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:17 pm
The Planning Board contended that it was unable to consider the application because respondent Steven M. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:30 am
So, I’m left to wonder about this effort at a broader level. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Allison B. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:47 am
§ 2B1.1(b)(1)(M). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:09 am
B. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
Rule 1.7(b)(4). [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 6:06 am
Cao, “la justificación básica para gravar impuestos es pagar por los servicios que provee el sector público. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Section 2(1)(d) of the … Meredith et al. v. [read post]
