Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 6301 - 6320
of 120,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2011, 9:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Certain information contained in personnel records may be redacted in complying with a Freedom of Information requestMatter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v City of Albany, 2009 NY Slip Op 04789, Decided on June 11, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Albany Times Union [TU] reporter filed two requests under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law Article 6) with City of Albany seeking documents, including "gun tags," related to the… [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm
The case of Bernardoni v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Circuit in People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:09 pm
V. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
It may not be able to compete with the Daily Show’s treatment of the same subject. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
This is a very useful opinion, rejecting numerous theories offered by the State that we may see once again in Williams. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
This is a very useful opinion, rejecting numerous theories offered by the State that we may see once again in Williams. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249 it is useful to take note of one of the salient features of Wyeth's brief, filed in May 2008. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:53 am
US, No. 04-2116 (6th Cir. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:48 pm
In Wollner v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:44 pm
In Resilient Floor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
I also know that judges may occasionally change their votes after reading a draft opinion.Those understandings aside, I always find it funny when I read an opinion by a three-judge panel in which the panel has to explain who's writing what and in which the "opinion for the court" is also authored by a dissenter.So in this morning's case, for example, Judge Alarcon authors the opinion for the court on one issue, but dissents as to another. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:15 pm
The National Collegiate Athletics Association, an organization which essentially regulates collegiate athletics in the United States, has voted to begin the process of allowing student athletes to profit from the use of their name, image and likeness. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
” Hancock v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 11:18 am
On its face, Loper Bright’s holding may appear simple: courts must determine the best reading of the applicable statutory provision using all available tools of interpretation, with room for non-binding respect to agency interpretations under Skidmore v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
The CAFC case Hollmer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm
That may seem super weird for Ninth Circuit judges. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Even in light of last week’s decision in US v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:12 am
Use your brain and DO NOT EVER WRITE ABOUT YOUR JOB, YOUR WORK, YOUR CO-WORKERS etc. on the INTERWEBS.amen. [read post]
