Search for: "Mark Case" Results 6301 - 6320 of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
The Board observed that courts and the TTAB have frequently ruled that consumers would not “stop and translate" marks comprised of terms in multiple languages, “often finding that the marks combine the different languages for suggestive purposes to create a certain commercial impression:” e.g., LE CASE for jewelry boxes; GLACÉ LITE for ice cream products. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:52 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:37 am
 So if you happen to have a coat of arms, it is your responsibility to monitor the UK register unless you happen to also have a registered trade mark in which case you should be notified by the UK IPO.Thanks to the New York Times for sharing these facts. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:43 am
"Decision: Noting that this is a "very close case," the Board found the marks to be sufficiently different to coexist, without creating a likelihood of confusion.And so the Board reversed the refusal to register. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 3:46 am
” Finally, L-Nutra pointed to a number of FAST-formative marks for various goods in class 5, but the Board pointed out for the umpteenth time that each case must be decided on its own evidentiary record, noting that "[m]arks that are merely descriptive or generic do not become registrable simply because other seemingly similar marks appear on the register. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 3:42 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.September 5, 2024 - 1 PM [Virtual]: In re Metabeauty, Inc., Serial No. 97492557 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below, for non-medicated skin care preparations and related retail store services, in view of the registered mark TWELVE COSMETICS for cosmetics [COSMETICS disclaimed].] [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:48 pm
According to one speaker yesterday (the Kat thinks it was OHIM's Paul Maier but is willing to be corrected) the ECJ has heard some 150 trade mark cases -- a remarkable number which represents around ten cases a year. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:47 pm by Vicki Heng
This was unlike the Team Lotus case cited by the Opponent where the trade marks consisted of complex designs. [read post]
Today marks the start of the trial in a landmark case challenging the discriminatory and counterproductive policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:04 am by John L. Welch
In a "very unusual" case, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark ARCADEWEB & Design for Internet marketing services, finding that the PTO had failed to meet its burden to show that the term ARCADEWEB is merely descriptive and must be disclaimed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Those images of trade marks that refuse to be shown on the Curia website (see earlier post here) are still rankling with the IPKat. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:12 am
 On the positive side, it appears that Slovak judges are now more experienced in trade mark matters than has been the case in the past. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
We often scoff at the TTAB's pronouncements that there is no per se rule that all alcoholic beverages are related, but put your cynicism aside while you read this case. [read post]