Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 6301 - 6320 of 16,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
Even when many pundits predict certiorari, it often doesn't materialize (case in point: Oracle v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:31 am by charonqc
This is a matter between her and HM Revenue & Customs and they, no doubt, are on top of the matter?. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm
If your readers are regulars, it won't matter much if you change the title (or re-direct the domain name). [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
 It's part of their job duties.If, as Tyler Cowen often quips, incentives matter, the end result of Ceballos is pretty clear: Don't speak out about police misconduct. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 4:35 pm by Tom Casagrande
Sept. 3, 2009), the plaintiff alleged it was the owner of the HENSLEY mark, which it purchased from Jim Hensley when it purchased Hensley’s trailer hitch business. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Unless the motion to dismiss is converted by the court to a motion for summary judgment, a motion to dismiss is not in a posture to be resolved as a matter of law” (id. at 669 [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:14 am by Dorien Morin-van Dam
Remember that these new routines and hobbies aren’t just distractions; they’re stepping stones to building a new life and moving forward. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
”[4] As one contemporaneous commentator observed “in light of the strong pressures from many organizations that the government should impose mandatory counselling, the counselling provisions of the Act mark a sound compromise between bitter realism and misguided idealism. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:26 pm
I don't agree with Mark Steyn and I can certainly appreciate Canada's robust traditions of free speech protections. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Defendants argued that “General Steel” wasn’t a valid mark. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
But, of course, they are not intellectual property…Don't worry, I'm exhausted too.. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Therefore, the suggested text for prominently marking that the subject-matter is “not covered by the claimed invention” appears to also apply here. [read post]