Search for: "People v. Story" Results 6301 - 6320 of 9,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
If they want to cover it, they will come up with a story that will do the trick. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by Eric Muller
And this brings me to another strength of the book: Greg significantly expands our knowledge of the legal history of this era by his careful account of the litigation of Duncan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:46 am by SHG
Granted, after the catch-22 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Administrator
In S and Marper v UK 30562/04 [2008] ECHR 1581 (4 December 2008) one of the reasons given by the European Court of Human Rights for holding that the UK’s retention of innocent people’s DNA records on a criminal register infringed their right to privacy was the lack of sufficiently strong safeguards. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 8:25 am
  (Cf. most people's reaction to prisoner complaints about their inability to access HBO and pornographic magazines -- for an example see Yarbrough v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am by John Culhane
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am by admin
  Yet walking has its own rules of etiquette and efficiency,  whose flouting generates friction, as revealed in this story from the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Press Gazette reports that Thurlbeck was threatened with an injunction over the post and that “Thurlbeck responded to the legal letter by taking the story down and then publishing a new edited version which remains live”. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
A Wall Street Journal story had raised the issue and others picked it up. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
The few close friends of mine who knew my story continued to encourage me to hire an attorney. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
  What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]