Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 22,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 9:20 am
[2] Inclusive Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:42 am
Facts: This case (Dawsey v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:37 am
Having on hand in the police station written or taped translations of the refusal right form is certainly not a huge burden on the State. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
State ex rel., Wyo. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Munoz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:43 am
State Street Bank and Trust Company. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:50 am
Franco v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
“Courts may review the record to determine whether the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took a hard look at them, and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its determination (see Matter of Chinese Staff & Workers’ Assn. v Burden, 19 NY3d 922, 924; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
“Courts may review the record to determine whether the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took a hard look at them, and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its determination (see Matter of Chinese Staff & Workers’ Assn. v Burden, 19 NY3d 922, 924; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:01 pm
Janetsky lightens that burden even further. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:19 pm
When the Supreme Court agreed to hear Fulton v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm
But according to Alito, a law violates the Clause only when the law is enacted for “the protectionist purpose of burdening out-of-state citizens”. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:22 pm
However, the ECJ in Phoenix v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:19 pm
In Avery v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
If the media judges adopt these types of orders and adapt them for the purposes of media cases, there may be a useful new remedy for media claimants and a further burden for media defendants. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
Here's the Court: While the state court is no doubt correct in asserting that marriage is a social relation subject to the State's police power, Maynard v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
