Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 7,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
Industry statistics for the United States show sales of computer and video games having increased from $10.1 billion in 2009 to $24.5 billion in 2016.[1] In Canada, the Electronic Software Association of Canada 2015 Industry Report states that it identified 472 active studios in operation across Canada in 2015, compared to 329 studios in 2013.[2] Such increases are fast and substantial. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
Industry statistics for the United States show sales of computer and video games having increased from $10.1 billion in 2009 to $24.5 billion in 2016.[1] In Canada, the Electronic Software Association of Canada 2015 Industry Report states that it identified 472 active studios in operation across Canada in 2015, compared to 329 studios in 2013.[2] Such increases are fast and substantial. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
That treatment goes against the Establishment Clause’s core principle of denomination neutrality. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
The core concern relates to the further specialization of the dispute resolution bodies within the state courts in order to promote the efficient resolution of cross-border commercial disputes. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
UgandaUnwanted Witness-Uganda v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
The book also offers a reading of Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:35 am
In Norton v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in M.Karunanidhi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am
These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
“Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm
In response to the comments, SESAC has stated that it “wholeheartedly supports the goals of the Music Modernization Act and wants those goals made law — just like you do. [read post]