Search for: "State v. Core" Results 6301 - 6320 of 7,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am by Jordana Sanft (CA)
Industry statistics for the United States show sales of computer and video games having increased from $10.1 billion in 2009 to $24.5 billion in 2016.[1] In Canada, the Electronic Software Association of Canada 2015 Industry Report states that it identified 472 active studios in operation across Canada in 2015, compared to 329 studios in 2013.[2] Such increases are fast and substantial. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am by Jordana Sanft (CA)
Industry statistics for the United States show sales of computer and video games having increased from $10.1 billion in 2009 to $24.5 billion in 2016.[1] In Canada, the Electronic Software Association of Canada 2015 Industry Report states that it identified 472 active studios in operation across Canada in 2015, compared to 329 studios in 2013.[2] Such increases are fast and substantial. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
That treatment goes against the Establishment Clause’s core principle of denomination neutrality. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm by Matthias Weller
 The core concern relates to the further specialization of the dispute resolution bodies within the state courts in order to promote the efficient resolution of cross-border commercial disputes. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in M.Karunanidhi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered:  1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  “Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm by Mateusz Rachubka
In response to the comments, SESAC has stated that it “wholeheartedly supports the goals of the Music Modernization Act and wants those goals made law — just like you do. [read post]