Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6301 - 6320 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Jason Mazzone
Romer compels that we affirm the judgment of the district court [invalidating Proposition 8].The problem is that Proposition 8 is nothing like Amendment 2 in Romer. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Bond Issue: On federal habeas corpus review of the state court’s resolution of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, did the court of appeals apply the "doubly deferential judicial review" standard required by Knowles v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Second, I am a little confused by the statement that "Panel determined that a disciplinary proceeding is not the proper forum for a declaration that a rule [Rule 83-1.5 of the Civil Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Utah] is unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
  The Bottom Line:  “The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee has certified the following questions to this Court pursuant to Rule 23 of the Tennessee Supreme Court. 1. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
When Oregon District Court Judge Anna Brown held that the right to international flight was a protected liberty interest, it was a pretty big deal. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm by Harry Styron
In a recent case from the Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals, First Bank v Fischer & Frichtel, Inc. [read post]