Search for: "United States of America v "
Results 6301 - 6320
of 8,953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 10:31 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting opinion in In re Request from the United Kingdom Pursuant to the Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters in the Matter of Dolours Price (D. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:50 am
In the United States of America v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
The Collectivist Culture The counterpart to the individualistic culture is the collectivist one, predominant in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
("Acceding" to the national constitution and canons does not mean subordinating oneself to them, any more than the United States of America, by acceding to Charter of the United Nations, places itself under the absolute governance of that body.) [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
United States of America for more information.” [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
These agreements create a framework for how companies should approach privacy in the United States and around the world. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 am
Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
United States of America, — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 5865225 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s speech will be (see Boy… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
If you think that corporations have disproportionate influence in American government, you need only look to the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. [read post]
