Search for: "BES v. State" Results 6321 - 6340 of 68,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jay J considered the law on this sub-issue to be correctly stated as being: “…a defence of fair comment would fail if the defendant omitted from the statement of facts on which the comment purported to be based some important fact that would falsify or alter the complexion of the facts that are stated” [127]. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Leslie Sammis
State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).The same issue raised in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
 A decision should be out later in the year.On the most recent decision (State of Calif. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:50 am
En banc review was denied, thus saving California's anti-SLAPP motions from being thrown out of federal court. [read post]