Search for: "California v. Force" Results 6321 - 6340 of 6,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Circuit (Detroit Newspaper Agency v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture and Nutrition LLC former Superfund Site (THAN Site) in Fresno, California was executed by the Agency on November 24, 2009. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
I am happy to pass along the Conference Report of the 9th Annual meeting of the European China Law Studies Association, held last November in Hong Kong. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Alan E. Brownstein
As a court of appeals judge, Judge Kavanaugh was required to construe and apply Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2008 majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2—U.S. and EU Perspectives on Trademark and Design Law in the Next Decade Annette Kur, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Associate Professor, Stockholm University Two regimes coexisting at the community level and harmonized national law; both regimes are interlinked in terms of prior rights in one creating barriers to rights in another. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:32 pm by lawmrh
Rptr. 856, 776 P.2d 765 concerning California attorney Laura Beth Lamb disbarred in 1989 for impersonating her husband in order to take the bar exam for him. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:48 pm by Yvonne Nath
There’s a lot of information I am not including here, but part of Parabis’ downfall was due to “reforms and a new fixed-fees regime for personal injury claims, both of which came into force in April 2013, reduced average revenue per case from £2,300 to £850. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
Because here is a person that will: * Represent a hated individual; * Receive death threats from other wackos out there; * Be outgunned by the Department of Justice; * And move from a private practice in Southern California to Arizona in order to do it, and do it for public dollars as opposed to more lucrative private ones. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As soon as you start saying it’s private party v. private party, must go to Article III. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]