Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 32,303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
It seems to have aimed for a middle-ground solution whereby Proposition 8 is declared unconstitutional in California, but the decision does not have broad implications for other States. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
A domestic issuer exemption was adopted by the Kansas Office of the Securities Commissioner, effective August 12, 2011, along with updates to federal securities statutory and rule references.An issuer’s offer or sale of a security is exempt from registration, advertising filing and issuer-agent licensing, provided:(1) the issuer is a Kansas-organized business;(2) the transaction complies with the federal intrastate offering exemption at Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:05 pm
The district court then reached the ultimate conclusion that the ’940 patent does not enable claims 1-5 of the ’814 patent and thus, it is not anticipatory. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:56 am
Ontiberos filed a cross-PR on March 8, 2011.]Here is coverage on What the Judge Ate for Breakfast. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
It also means 25% (1 in 4) still had no contract in four years. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
The language in the CARES Act does not require the landlord to provide an opportunity to cure. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:49 am
It beat out North Carolina, who does not appear on the list despite having almost 1 million more people. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:26 pm
Pennsylvania 8. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:01 pm
Rul. 2012-4 are specifically limited to rollovers made on or after Jan. 1, 2013 pursuant to Code section 7805(b)(8) but the IRS states it will permit plan sponsors to rely on the holdings of this ruling with respect to rollovers made prior to Jan. 1, 2013. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:57 am
The article does not specify whether the man's blood-alcohol content was tested. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:26 am
The petitioner argued that the judgment “unambiguously” precluded the action and that the appeals court only refused to apply the judgment bar due to two incorrect propositions that were previously rejected by the Supreme Court: (1) that when the US prevails in an FTCA action, the district court must dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and (2) a jurisdictional dismissal does not trigger the judgment bar. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm
The online event will take place on Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:30 AM PDT / 1:30 PM EDT. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session Utah 1/23/12 Minnesota 1/24/12 Committee Activity of Note January 23 South Dakota House Judiciary Committee HB 1064 Allows the Supreme Court to establish certain rules for the use of interactive audio visual equipment and to provide for the collection and deposit of fees for the use thereof. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:44 am
Denny’s Corporation, asserts claims under New Jersey law for consumer fraud, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1, et seq., and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the New Jersey U.C.C., N.J.S.A. 12A:2-314(1)-(2). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:20 pm
This case presents the following issues: (1) Does a worker’s assignment to the worker’s union of a cause of action for meal and rest period violations carry with it the worker’s right to sue in a representative capacity under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Section 8 deals with exemption from disclosure of information and is extracted in its entirety: "8. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Volta, 82 USPQ2d 1339 (TTAB 2007) [Board rejected Australian Applicants' claim of misunderstanding as to the requirements of Section 1(a)]; Standard Knitting, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:23 pm
This means that the exchange rate does not affect prices directly. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
It is noteworthy that the provision does not refer to the court, but to its respective judge, which implies that no oral hearing is needed. 2: The application is dismissed, if it does not fulfil the requirements stipulated in the Regulation, or if the applicant does not state the information provided by Article 8 EAPO, or if (s)he does not proceed to the requested amendments or corrections of the application within the time limit set by the Judge. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:36 am
Does the HOA have $1 million liability coverage? [read post]
