Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 6321 - 6340 of 108,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Lisa Baird
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit posed to the New York State Court of Appeals last month when it requested an advisory opinion from the state’s highest court in order to resolve Doe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am by Jim Pravel
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") held in In re Suitco Surface, Inc., 2009-1418 (CAFC, April 14, 2010) that the "broadest broadest-construction rubric coupled with the term “comprising” does not give the PTO an unfettered license to interpret claims to embrace anything remotely related to the claimed invention. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 5:53 am
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has held that an insurer of municipal bonds does not have standing to bring an action for federal securities fraud under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Act (“the Act”). [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., May 1, 2013), a Texas appeals court rejected a husband's claim that the divorce decree dissolving his marriage and appointing both parents as joint managing conservators of the children violated the Establishment Clause by requiring him on Sunday mornings when he had the children to allow his former wife to pick them up to take them to religious classes. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:15 am by Joseph Robinson
The post ‘Graphical User Interface’ does not necessarily invoke means-plus function analysis appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
C.Cr.P. art. 798(2)(a) and (b) is neutral and generally applicable because (1) it does not focus on a particular religion or religion at all, and (2) it applies to anyone regardless of the source of his or her views on the death penalty. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Purdue does not persuasivelyrebut these findings on appeal. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
§141(c)  does not confer standing on IPR petitioners nor does it remove the requirement for standing to appeal final written decisions of the PTAB. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court’s ruling does not apply to the pre-existing exception for the Metlakatla Indian Community of the Annette Island Reserve or its members. 25 C.F.R. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:18 am by Helene Wasserman
The California Court of Appeal rendered its decision in the Brinker case, addressing meal and rest break issues in California. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Adam Wagner
The appeal was of Mr Justice Saunders’ ruling in the Southwark Crown Court that the parliamentary privilege enshrined in the 1688 Bill of Rights does not extend to protecting the four ex-MPs, Elliott Morley, David Chaytor, James Devine and Lord Hanningfield, from prosecutions for claiming inflated expenses. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:17 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
The presiding judge of the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that the Protocol does not override the advance notice provisions present in brokers’ contracts. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:17 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
The presiding judge of the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that the Protocol does not override the advance notice provisions present in brokers’ contracts. [read post]