Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 6321 - 6340 of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Three liberal justices dissented, and Justice Stephen Breyer separately dissented, questioning the constitutionality of the death penalty by any method. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
In 2010, as reported in my first post about the case, Justice Stephen A. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The state of California’s lawyer, Washington attorney Carter G. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Sandi Zellmer
Given the statutory ambiguities, readers may wonder why the Park Service’s reading of ANILCA and its own enabling acts would not be entitled to deference from the Supreme Court under Chevron v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
These two arbitrators shall appoint by mutual agreement a third arbitrator, the Chairperson, who shall be a national of a third State. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:23 am by Ilya Somin
In his dissent to today's Supreme Court Second Amendment ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]