Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 14,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Aug. 4, 2020): Not a really significant case, but I like it because it involves a strong illustration of the concept of relativity of title—the owner of these works is not Disney, and successfully registered the copyright thereto and asserted an infringement claim against a person who copied these works on Etsy. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Rostami v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
In Slayton v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
(Nadarajah v Secretary of State[2005] EWCA Civ 1363) Whether a promise should be honoured depends upon the respective force of the competing interests in the case. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:57 am
In Stengart v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
American federal courts-be they in California or any other state-have a strong interest in adjudicating and redressing international human rights abuses. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm
Hashim v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
In Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm
Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
In Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:10 pm
Doesn’t the fact that 46 states have not sought this information, Kavanaugh suggested, indicate that the state’s interest is not particularly strong? [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
While names of menu items don’t make for particularly strong marks, plenty of precedent exists for granting them protection. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
State of Indiana (NFP) C.G. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
In these cases—Elrod v. [read post]