Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 10,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc., 998 So. 2d 1102, 111 (Fla. 2008), aff’d, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc., 998 So. 2d 1102, 111 (Fla. 2008), aff’d, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:41 am
b) El saldo restante en el plazo máximo de noventa (90) días calendario posterior al primer desembolso. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
“(1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made (a) is a member of the bar of a court, or his subordinate and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed (a) by his client (b) without the presence of strangers (c) for the purpose of securing primarily either (i) an opinion on law or (ii)… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 10:30 am
B. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:01 am
The patents in trial B were found invalid for obviousness. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:31 am
*By Devin Lucas and Shafik Bhalloo In Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:31 am
*By Devin Lucas and Shafik Bhalloo In Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:02 pm
G.S. 15A-1411(c) (“The relief formerly available by motion in arrest of judgment . . . is available by motion for appropriate relief. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The contribution argues that the resulting context provides a basis for either for extending sovereign immunity to those regulatory responsibilities of all economic actors (irrespective of their public or private ownership) or of the reconception of sovereign regulation through legal compliance obligations as inherently commercial and thus not protected b principles of sovereign immunity when undertaken by SOEs. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:56 am
In Robertson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
B. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
B. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
B. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
Hepatitis A outbreaks associated with fresh, frozen, and minimally processed produce, worldwide, from 1983 to 2016—adapted and expanded from Sivapalasingam et al., 2004 and Fiore, 2004. [read post]
