Search for: "BARRETT" Results 6341 - 6360 of 6,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2007, 7:18 am
The Health 2.0: User-Generated Healthcare Conference officially gets underway today but the pre-conference gathering was a great time last evening. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 am by David Rossmiller
After a year's hiatus, I've been looking for the right time to start blogging again. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
After a long and distinguished career as a popular public servant, first as a councillor, then then as a TD, and finally as a Minister, Pat Carey is now a public affairs consultant. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Kelly Tipple Barrett, dealing with a scheme to defraud dozens of victims by siphoning cash from the equity in their homes, where the defendant was charged with eight counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1343 and two counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1028A. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
[Like in the Emoluments Clauses cases, plaintiff’s mere allegation that the government is acting ultra vires is not enough to establish an equitable cause of action ] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer, Maynooth University Department of Law. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
  The Scruggs Katrina Group originally consisted of Mississippi attorneys from these other firms as well: the Barrett Law Office; Jones, Funderburg, Peterson, Sessums, and Lee; the Lovelace Law Firm; and Nutt & McAllister, PLLC. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
Lee Barrett of E-Everything for Bankruptcy Lawyers... might be a process juror. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
We have Justice Barrett who joined the Alito opinion and a concurring opinion by Justice Thomas that expressly suggests that decisions like Obergefell, Griswold and Lawrence need review. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm by Josh Blackman
[It will be harder for conservative litigants in blue states and liberal litigants in red states to obtain statewide relief. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mueller Suggests Only Congress Can ‘Formally Accuse a Sitting President of Wrongdoing’ Anchorage Daily News – Matt Zapotosky, Devlin Barrett, and Felicia Sonmez (Washington Post) | Published: 5/29/2019 Special counsel Robert Mueller reiterated that his office could not clear President Trump of obstructing justice, asserting in his first public remarks about his investigation that federal prosecutors cannot accuse a president of a crime. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a short statement that was joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
[I suspect the Court punted this Kentucky COVID case to avoid jumping the gun on Fulton.] [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
Administrative law is almost certain to undergo monumental change during the Supreme Court’s current Term. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am by Schachtman
Trigger Warning: Political Rant “Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
During his four years in office, Trump placed three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – on the court, cementing a 6-3 conservative majority. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]