Search for: "County v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 33,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 6:30 am
However, in Capital cases for rape of a woman or child not involving death, execution has been ruled to be unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court through their decisions in Coker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
On March 30, 2010 the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit issued a decision in the Peconic Baykeeper v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
Herelle v South London Family Housing Association Ltd, CC/2009/PTA/0737 (High Court Chancery Division) 20 July 2010 [Not reported elsewhere] Perhaps apropos of J's recent comments on RSLs 'fighting daft disrepair cases', we have an update on what was a County Court disrepair claim against an RSL that we first reported here. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
Herelle v South London Family Housing Association Ltd, CC/2009/PTA/0737 (High Court Chancery Division) 20 July 2010 [Not reported elsewhere] Perhaps apropos of J's recent comments on RSLs 'fighting daft disrepair cases', we have an update on what was a County Court disrepair claim against an RSL that we first reported here. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§§ 1331, 1362 and 1367, in that plaintiffs claims arise under the laws of the United States, including federal common law, plaintiff is an American Indian tribe with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as maintaining government-to-government relations with the United States and exercising jurisdiction over the federal trust lands of the Cahuilla Indian Reservation in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, California, near… [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:46 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
  The County of Los Angeles and several cities filed test claims with the Commission on State Mandates (Commission) seeking State reimbursement for these permit provisions because they exceeded the federal "maximum extent practicable" standard. [read post]