Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 6341 - 6360 of 16,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 11:39 pm by Nate Russell
” I know what you’re probably thinking: 50 percent of US Supreme Court links don’t work? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Just how conservative he will be, and how he will come out on particular matters, I don’t know. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
NASCAR has all sorts of stuff that can be purchased online with it’s brand name and trademark on it, but to serve a trademark function (identify, distinguish, and indicate the source of gasoline), and to demonstrate proper use in commerce of a word mark (as opposed to non-traditional subject matter like colors and scents — we’ll pass on the possibility of taste for this one though), applying the mark directly on the goods isn’t possible… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Kraft Food Brands Group LLC, in which the justices will consider the rules governing the venue in which patent infringement lawsuits can be filed, noting that although “Congress could clear up the matter in ten minutes – either by adopting a venue rule explicitly contemplating forum-shopping, or by closing it down in favor of narrowly defined venue,”  “it doesn’t, … so this enormous policy decision gets kicked over to the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 10:04 am by Cannabis Law Group
A big question mark is whether the government is going to entrust states with more authority in these matters, in which case cannabis tourism is likely to soar. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 11:58 pm by Mark Summerfield
  So, aside from the fact that you would have to laugh, otherwise you would cry for the demise of Australian democracy, you might be wondering what any of this has got to do with the usual subject matter of this blog. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Just as in 1931, however, they don’t have the country on their side. [read post]
However, as the needs of a child can change over time, the fact that an order is marked “permanent” doesn’t necessarily mean it cannot be changed under the right circumstances. [read post]
However, as the needs of a child can change over time, the fact that an order is marked “permanent” doesn’t necessarily mean it cannot be changed under the right circumstances. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:46 am by Dean Freeman
Defendant argued the fall was plaintiff’s fault because he stood on the pail shelf, which is clearly marked as not for standing. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Christine Farley, American University Washington College of Law (Moderator)Ned Snow, University of South CarolinaGov’t interest in not registering marks? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Washington Post – Mark Berman | Published: 1/23/2017 For wary journalists, it seemed only a matter of time before Donald Trump’s presidency would lead to a standoff between his administration and the news media. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The CJEU therefore rejected the appeal, and didn't refer the matter back to the General Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:58 am by Susan Hennessey, Jordan Brunner
Since the BBC story, numerous other outlets have confirmed with their own sources the existence of an interagency investigation into the matter, including McClatchy DC, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As to "myths" which appear in law reviews, some discussion about Mark Lemley's "Myth of the Sole Inventor" [ 105 Mich. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:08 am by Kevin Goldberg
But if you don’t have the stomach for taking on a multi-billion dollar entity which has shown little regard about its public image when it comes to this sort of thing (not to mention bigger things that actually matter to society like the best interests of its players and fans,) then you should probably proceed cautiously. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 7:45 am by admin
While we don’t comment on pending litigation, we intend to defend ourselves and look forward to clearing our name in this matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm by Jeffrey Risman
While we don’t comment on pending litigation, we intend to defend ourselves and look forward to clearing our name in this matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm by Jeffrey Risman
While we don’t comment on pending litigation, we intend to defend ourselves and look forward to clearing our name in this matter. [read post]